For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, bphomesteading.com who developed it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to expand his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the vague pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public information from a large variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and prawattasao.awardspace.info whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector visualchemy.gallery over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.