The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites using both complimentary casino-style games and financially rewarding prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the business deals with allegations of unlawful sports betting in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of celebrities from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for actual gaming losses.

Others lure clients with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and estates before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The discrepancy in between sports betting websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social gambling establishments provide clients a chance to play casino-style video games with buddies. Players have the option to buy worthless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, but can be used to open different features within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling customers to get other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement showing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require typically need identification. However, websites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, therefore offering them a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an essential difference in between social sweeps and conventional online gaming websites like casinos.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that offer them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself doesn't meet the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the qualities typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a short-lived marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the earnings earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, providing clients the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have considering that been shuttered over allegations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to face similar examination.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

Among the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gambling changes that carried out through controlled channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest lawsuit, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We generally don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games throughout most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not just great games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to strongly protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns in between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos could show troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against illegal gambling - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently prohibited gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our worths are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at danger along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton